
Originally Posted by
Codex
Hurm... Well then. I shall have to write down some convincing arguments as to why they should BOTH be slaughtered, and choose the one that is a less appealing villain to me.
Lamb is insane. Now, she isn't as bad as say Cohen, but she's pretty distraught. Since Elanor has been confirmed to be her daughter and at one time a Little Sister, this is not all that surprising. A mother's separation from her child, especially as what appears to be as punishment for disagreeing with Ryan, is a terrible thing to have to live through.
Nonetheless, I cannot help but think that it is her own doing. She helped Ryan, at least as evidenced by the tape today. I believe that if she truly were concerned about her morals, she would be able to have denied his requests for assistance. I'm a firm believer that if you believe in something, you don't compromise those beliefs by assisting those in something you believe is morally wrong.
Sinclair, on the other hand, is a slimy little bastard. At this point, I cannot determine ANY redeeming feature. He's your typical Randian "capitalist," maybe he's even the Toohey of Bioshock 2. As such, he's predictable and a lot more easy to trust when you realize you cannot trust a thing he says.
As such, because Lamb offends me so, even though Sinclair is beyond redemption, I vote that Lamb has to be offed. She's too unstable, too dangerous. At least with Sinclair you can watch and understand him and the extent of where he's going to betray you in his own interests. Lamb... Lamb you just cant trust.