Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 43

Thread: No PS3 tournaments/leagues?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690

    No PS3 tournaments/leagues?

    Why aren't there any current ps3 tournaments or leagues? I know there's at least half a dozen active ps3 forum members. Why doesn't someone start a tournament or something? I get tired of playing noobs in ranked that don't even know how to defend against a horserush. Very boring. Might as well be playing SP.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In Exile, perfecting my style
    Posts
    1,768
    It's been a long time since anything has been accomplished on the PS3 - THIS last attempt by scottie at the end of last year was a bit of a fail.

    Best thing you can do is start another and see if there is interest? - You, newsgothic, Raven - I can't think of anyone else?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Plus tcseow and japyaknees. Oh yeah, there's also Barney (except he whines when someone 'double moves' him even though he does it himself, lol). I know HGB rarely plays, anymore. Shame. I'll try to get some of my 'friends' to join the forum and any tournaments that are started. Spainful81 is good with spanish. But, i've never seen him use any other civ.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    152
    Im up for this, hopefully get some good worthy games in against good players, rather than the walkover ranked is 99% of the time.

    Maybe we can start off with a small tourney and maybe more people will show their face?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenmisca View Post
    Im up for this, hopefully get some good worthy games in against good players, rather than the walkover ranked is 99% of the time.

    Maybe we can start off with a small tourney and maybe more people will show their face?
    Sounds good. You wanna start/organize it or should i try it?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    737
    Im in. set it up. ill also round up some people from the chatroom that are good that aren't forum members. by the way im cbloyola23 and im also spainful

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by japyaknees View Post
    Im in. set it up. ill also round up some people from the chatroom that are good that aren't forum members. by the way im cbloyola23 and im also spainful
    Huh? You're Spainful81?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    936
    xWise is also very good.

    I played in the tourney and it was a lot of fun while it lasted. Problem is that I play at the same time of day, so the only people I ever played were tsceow and Barney (only seen him on a couple of times). Played Doja a couple of times but again, seems like he usually plays later. Rarely saw Scottie but I think that's because he defected.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Lancashire, England
    Posts
    1,596
    Good to see you CBloyola again! We had some great games on the PS3 when we used to both abuse America!! ;-)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    737
    Yes we did. I was no good back then though. Had never been to the forums and soaked up all this knowledge. i am much better nowadays. Just would win because america allows decent players to win if the map is set up right. Think what made me get better was watching a video duke posted when he had egypt vs aztecs, and he stated top level games are mostly a race to industrialization. CHANGED MY LIFE. Lol. I didnt even know about oxford bombers before then. thought it was random!!!! Those were the days.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    152
    Go ahead set it up Star, you are a better person for that then me for sure.


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by japyaknees View Post
    Yes we did. I was no good back then though. Had never been to the forums and soaked up all this knowledge. i am much better nowadays. Just would win because america allows decent players to win if the map is set up right. Think what made me get better was watching a video duke posted when he had egypt vs aztecs, and he stated top level games are mostly a race to industrialization. CHANGED MY LIFE. Lol. I didnt even know about oxford bombers before then. thought it was random!!!! Those were the days.
    That is the classic Duke/Egypt vs. Thrasher/Aztec game, i believe. First one i ever watched i think...So you are Spainful81, then?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenmisca View Post
    Go ahead set it up Star, you are a better person for that then me for sure.

    OK. I'll have to look over again how they are set up in in the x-box tournaments. Don't know when i'll be able to do it. Sometime within next couple days hopefully. One thing i don't like is the "no oxford" rule. So if i'm the one to set up the tournaments i will most likely allow oxford. The rest of rules will probably be same.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    152
    I think the xbox folks can more easily explain to you why Oxford should be banned, i really dont want a race to industrialization every game. Because thats what im certainly aiming for in every game, if it would be allowed. I dont think it shows much skill to build Oxford the first and then win because you got ridiculous OP unit for your time.

    Im open for your point of vieuw ofc.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    737
    Honestly... Even without oxford its still kind of a race to industrialization. +5 gold/city is such a game changer. yes star i am sPAINful

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    152
    I agree with that, but im sure people will spend more time to finish it in the earlier phases. Oxford and its 100% over, somebody gets to indus, and the other person better made sure they have a reason why to be behind in tech. You still get a chance, you can also both get 1 of the money techs and it will be even.

    The problem with oxford is if you manage to grab a few scientists you win the game, no skill required.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    936
    I'm ok with Oxford. Many games don't go that long anyway.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenmisca View Post
    I agree with that, but im sure people will spend more time to finish it in the earlier phases. Oxford and its 100% over, somebody gets to indus, and the other person better made sure they have a reason why to be behind in tech. You still get a chance, you can also both get 1 of the money techs and it will be even.

    The problem with oxford is if you manage to grab a few scientists you win the game, no skill required.
    Sorry Raven, but that's one thing i'm inflexible about. We can discuss other things (probably better to take discussion to other thread) but that is 1 rule i'm sticking with. Oxford allowed. You wanted me to organize this so if i'm going to take time and effort to do it then that is 1 rule i want. Maybe next tournament if i'm tired of it i'll take it out. Or if u organize u can set the rules. Main reason i want it is that i'm a person of habbit. I still play a good amount of ranked play in which alot of my games are decided by oxford bombers. cont....

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    ...if i get in habbit of playing differently here then my rank will surely suffer for it.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    152
    So you are afraid not allowing oxford will hurt your ranking on these tourneys?? Im sure you can win games without using a tactic that should never been in the game at all.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenmisca View Post
    So you are afraid not allowing oxford will hurt your ranking on these tourneys?? Im sure you can win games without using a tactic that should never been in the game at all.
    No, i'm afraid not allowing oxford will hurt my real ranking because as i said i'm a creature of habit. If i start getting in habbit of playing like oxford is not in game then my real ranking will suffer since oxford is always allowed in ranked play. Unless u can somehow convince everyone who plays ranked not to use oxford EVER AGAIN, lol.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    152
    Maybe if the ranking would mean anything i would agree

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenmisca View Post
    Maybe if the ranking would mean anything i would agree
    LOL. Yeah, i know you can't tell a players true skill level by their ranking. But, still the competitive nature in me wants to be ranked high. Anyway, it's a moot argument now as japyaknees has taken it upon himself to be the organizer. Looks like he's banning it. Happy now?

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    366
    Quote Originally Posted by Star428 View Post
    Sorry Raven, but that's one thing i'm inflexible about. We can discuss other things (probably better to take discussion to other thread) but that is 1 rule i'm sticking with. Oxford allowed. You wanted me to organize this so if i'm going to take time and effort to do it then that is 1 rule i want. Maybe next tournament if i'm tired of it i'll take it out. Or if u organize u can set the rules. Main reason i want it is that i'm a person of habbit. I still play a good amount of ranked play in which alot of my games are decided by oxford bombers. cont....
    Thats the great thing about these xbox tournaments with no oxford. everyone had gotten used to racing for oxford bombers, by not allowing it it forces people to come up with new strategies with far more galleon and cat army attacks. It mixes things up and makes people think a bit more than be hard core set on one strategy. but it is your tournament and you set it up the way you want to.
    Last edited by Digitalpackrat; 04-24-2012 at 08:24 PM.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Digitalpackrat View Post
    Thats the great thing about these xbox tournaments with no oxford. everyone was gotten used to racing for oxford bombers, by not allowing it it forces people to come up with new strategies with far more galleon and cat army attacks. It mixes things up and makes people think a bit more than be hard core set on one strategy. but it is your tournament and you set it up the way you want to.
    Agreed 100%. I was the one who originally proposed banning Oxford and we have never looked back. Allowing Oxford means every game is horshrush>>>>>oxford. But I don't have a PS3, so who am I to tell you what to do :P

  26. #26
    star u talk a lot of sh#$ for someone who gets the @ss handed to them, im more of a noob and beat you all the time, i lost all respect for you ! after our last game when i smoked you i say to you GG and you reply back F$#$ me and my USA sh@# CLASSY old man

  27. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Star428 View Post
    No, i'm afraid not allowing oxford will hurt my real ranking because as i said i'm a creature of habit. If i start getting in habbit of playing like oxford is not in game then my real ranking will suffer since oxford is always allowed in ranked play. Unless u can somehow convince everyone who plays ranked not to use oxford EVER AGAIN, lol.
    your rank HAHAHA you will never be #1 that will always be the civaddict and pfdanig battling over it, you have no skill or class !

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by the_mexican View Post
    your rank HAHAHA you will never be #1 that will always be the civaddict and pfdanig battling over it, you have no skill or class !
    I never claimed i'd be # 1 dumb###. At least i don't cheat like pfdnanig. BTW, that's only 2nd time u ever beat me , dip☺☺☺☺. Using GD usa it's not so hard to do. And did i ever ask for your respect...? Nope. I 'm putting u on ignore. The reason i was upset is not cause u beat me it's cause i get so ######## sick of playing people using usa when they obviously are not noobs and have to rely on usa's broken bonus.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by the_mexican View Post
    your rank HAHAHA you will never be #1 that will always be the civaddict and pfdanig battling over it, you have no skill or class !
    ...And do u seriously think it takes skill to use America? LOL.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Montréal
    Posts
    1,841
    Quote Originally Posted by Star428 View Post
    ...And do u seriously think it takes skill to use America? LOL.
    Just don't answer to him... I'm impressed this kind of talk hasn't come sonner from him...

    Really not worth it...

  31. #31
    that loss set you back eh from your conquest of first hahah glad i could help star

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    737
    This is the same guy who started a thread that i was GW glitching him... Only thing is I had the GW! This guys a joke.

  33. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by japyaknees View Post
    This is the same guy who started a thread that i was GW glitching him... Only thing is I had the GW! This guys a joke.

    never said u glictched. i said u would attack then ask for peace right away, thats the same thats the same as demi glitchign in my book, i play fair and always accept beause thats part of the game, you two are always whining, not j a p mostly star guy is a creepy old man when he loses he complains because i was usa, j a p you use usa that game i beleive you dont see me whining

  34. #34
    bottom line none of us cheat, i dont care about rank i just want to have fun i send a gg message to everyone and Star is the only one who is disrespectful. Cant believe an old man has zero class

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,690
    Quote Originally Posted by the_mexican View Post
    bottom line none of us cheat, i dont care about rank i just want to have fun i send a gg message to everyone and Star is the only one who is disrespectful. Cant believe an old man has zero class
    Dude. You don't even know me. "Creepy"? WTF do u mean by that? "Old man"? I'm 40, kid and everybody who knows me says i still look like a teenager. Anyway, i'm done reading your ignorant garbage.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,438
    Quote Originally Posted by the_mexican View Post
    bottom line none of us cheat, i dont care about rank i just want to have fun i send a gg message to everyone and Star is the only one who is disrespectful. Cant believe an old man has zero class
    At least he knows how to speak English...

  37. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by Star428 View Post
    Dude. You don't even know me. "Creepy"? WTF do u mean by that? "Old man"? I'm 40, kid and everybody who knows me says i still look like a teenager. Anyway, i'm done reading your ignorant garbage.

    ur that creepy old dude at the bar, preying on the drunkest girl you see

  38. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by ITZ DENI3D View Post
    At least he knows how to speak English...
    im mexican , spanish is my first language, how many langauges can you speak or write, ☺☺☺☺☺ SLAPPED

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,438
    Quote Originally Posted by the_mexican View Post
    im mexican , spanish is my first language, how many langauges can you speak or write, ☺☺☺☺☺ SLAPPED
    I'm sure you sound just as retarded in your language buddy...

  40. #40
    am back from vacation. unfortunately too late for japyaknees's tourney. any other tourney available?

    i am hunger for a good game! any1 like to defeat me?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •