Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 126

Thread: Very disappointed in this game.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    118

    Exclamation Very disappointed in this game.

    NOTE TO FORUM MEMBERS: I will not be coming back. So you can save all your predictable dumbass comments.



    Hello IG, I am amazed. I can't believe what an enormous let down this game is.

    My main gripe, is that you cashing in on the memory of System Shock, but you didn't even attempt to live up to its greatness. System Shock was revolutionary, and SS2 basically brought it up to date. All of that creativity was well and truly dead in this game, wasn't it? What went wrong?

    I suspect you don't think anything went wrong do you? This was absolutely according to plan eh? Make a big dumb modern game, cashing in on your credibility from the System Shock games, you'll all make a fortune, and then either retire, or get to make more games in the future because nobody cares that it was a classic example of devolution. Investers just look at how many units you sold, and you sold well, like Britany Spears or Christina Aguilera. Congrats IG... You went from being the Led Zeppelin of gaming, to being the Hit Me Baby One More Time of gaming.

    You have completely raped, and pillaged, the System Shock series, all for this dumb shooter game. Also, not only that, and not only was there a massive lack of creativity in this game... but it seemed to have such a strange lack of a logical vision... The game is full of weapons, violence, blood, children stabbing corpses in the head, ☺☺☺☺s and ☺☺☺☺s... so its clearly not kid friendly... But then you go and add all that kiddie crap to the game.. Little 5 year old girls constantly saying, "Come on my biggly squiggly bigglesss!!! An aaaangel!!!!. Angels are waiting for us to kiss them!!!" etc... What the ☺☺☺☺ where you thinking? Then theres all the dumb dialogue, and half assed story. So its like you made a dumb kids game, for dumb kids, but you went and added tons of violence, gore, and bad language to it. So you are either complete clueless idiots, or you aimed the game at a very specific age group.. the low to mid teens. Because really, lower than that age, the parents would go ape if they saw their little 9 year old kid playing the game. And the majority of people in their 20s or above, would find the game to be so dumb, it wouldn't appeal to them.

    You also went and made one of the top 5 games of all time, in terms of WORST value for money. Its right up there with Max Payne 2. Reguardless of how you play it, the game is over in no time. And then theres no multiplayer, and no replayability (again, unless you are simple minded and seriously bored). So this is a full price game which lasts a matter of days. What a pile of crap.

    I think, to be fair, if this was just another anonymous First Person Shooter, I wouldn't have anything to say about it at all - besides perhaps that its an "ok" game. It wasn't as good as FEAR, Halflife 2, or STALKER, etc... But its maybe better than some mass produced FPS's. Its somewhere between mediocre, and above average. But this wasn't supposed to be, "Just another FPS".... this is a game with a legacy and heritage and a reputation, and like I said, you well and truly raped and pillaged this game's grandparents to make it. It makes me wonder if a different team was responsible for this? Perhaps just one upper management person remained from the old System Shock days? And perhaps this is an indication that either SS was a fluke... or they are just out to make the most possible money, and nothing else matters. If that is the case (which I am positive it is), then please... in the future.... just make a "The Sims" clone or some crap like that... You know it sells well, so do that. Don't make another pile of crap like Bioshock and con all the old school players into buying it.

    So basically, its all a huge let down. I will think twice before ever buying an IG game again. You are "just another modern game producer" now... mass producing modern mindless crap. A big dumb, modern FPS, for the retarded modern console gaming crowd. This is to System Shock, what Deus Ex 2 was to Deus Ex.... It REALLY does amaze me, that the only improvement in this game, over System Shock 1, was the graphics. That game is 13 years old now.... and it was 10 times better than this. One of the things that made it so great, was the atmosphere... and that was lost in this game. This wasn't scary at all, it was just drab. All the enemies looked identical, and all the locations looked pretty much the same too. And there was no feeling of isolation like the SS games either. I never sneaked around with my back to the wall, crapping myself.... In this game I could just run around like a headless chicken, shooting anything that moved. There where no consequences at all... So what if I run into a camera? I just stand there and give it the middle finger and die... 4 seconds later, I'm back there and all the bots are gone. So what if I run into a splicer.. right click left click and its dead. And if it kills me, who cares? Real mindless crap. But not only is it dumbed down, its also simplified in other ways too. The inventory is gone now... No more stashing gear and having to go back for it when you need it.... It no longer feels like you are REALLY locked on a space station and you have to use any dirty tricks you can think of to survive... No.. Now, its just a dumb action game. No more damage to your gear, so you save your vibrosword for a desperate situation etc.. And there is so much money and ammo, you had to put artificial limits on it... And the one thing that really amazed me the most, when I first played System Shock back in 1994.... is gone now. The grenades.... I had emps, and frags, and all kinds of interesting stuff, and the character threw them wherever I clicked. There weren't even any grenades at ALL in this game! (besides the molotov type things thrown at the player). Hacking was mindless dumb crap too, like a flash game. The layout of the levels was all crap too. No security doors blocking you, until collect keys etc... Basically, there was absolutely no reason to switch my brain on at all. And the story was mediocre crap too.

    To me, this game was like a poor mans "action RPG". And by "ACTION rpg", I mean just that... You know... when you make a game for modern retarded young people today, you call it action-something... So its not a REAL rpg like Baldurs Gate or something.. Its like an action-rpg... Like Dungeon Siege or some crap. The game's mediocre combat, was just like the combat in Oblivion. And that was the thing that disappointed me the most about Oblivion........

    So you run around with your half dozen guns like some friggen DOOM clone.... No great innovation there like Duke Nukem or "No One Lives Forever" etc.. just a damn shotgun and machine gun and rocket launcher etc... How uninspired can you get? And then the twist was meant to be the right click effects. But they are just a direct copy from 75 billion RPG games out there. The fire is just a fireball..... (or firebolt in Oblivion), and then there are the bog standard, ice and lightning equivalents or the fire bolt. Infact, you didn't even have disease or arcane equivalents like in a real RPG. And then you make a big deal (one of your selling points) about "USE MIND CONTROL ON YOUR ENEMIES OMGZZ!!!!!".... You realise there has been a charm/dominate spell in RPG's for probably 25 years now? I was running around with charmed mobs in EverQuest before this game was even an idea. And that game was online with thousands of players....

    The thing this reminded me of the most, was M+M Dark Messiah.... Running around shooting magic out your hands. The difference is... Dark Messiah was fun! And this was dumb. From what I can remember of Dark Messiah, it was 10 times better than Bioshock. I ran around firing enormous fireballs, which would explode on the ground, and blast a bunch of my enemies into the walls etc.. Some would fall off a nearby cliff to their death, and some would land in a fire. It wasn't just much better combat either... it great level design too, and it was just so much more compelling and fun, with some great scripted events etc.

    So Bioshock lacked the fun factor of Dark Messiah. And, it lacks the massive world and million quests of Oblivion. Your game is basically just about half a dozen rooms, strung together with that air lock. It didn't feel like an underwater world at all by the way... It felt like a typical bunch of generic FPS "levels", strung together by that hub. I had no sense of where everywhere was in relation to other areas etc... No sense of going up and down levels like in SS. The world didn't fit together in my mind at all. And guess what? Not only was the "world" so small and simplified, but you added that dumb global positioning system map, which I didn't even need to use. There where so many signs on the floor and walls, I could just look at them if I ever needed to - which I didn't. The whole thing was so linear, there was no chance of getting lost anyway.

    I was reading some other forum where people where talking about the game, and some guy said, "It sucks, I much prefer STALKER or Two Worlds". I remember thinking, "My god, that doesn't say much for Bioshock... Both of those games bored me". But I bought Bioshock anyway, to give it a chance. Now I know.... I had more fun in 5 minutes of STALKER than I did in this game.

    P.S. That final battle with the "final boss"... made me feel like I had gone back to the 80s... and was playing some ☺☺☺☺ty first person remake of Double Dragon or something.. Game development at its most uninspired.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    118
    Pre-emptive comment: Yes it looks long. You see kids, people with fully formed brains can read quite fast. So, although to you, this is more text than you have seen in your entire life, and the nearest you ever got to reading a book, was Winnie the Pooh, this is a 3 minute read for most people.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    565
    You're full of ☺☺☺☺. If the game was so bad you wouldn't have finished it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New York F*CKIN CITY YEEEEAH! lol
    Posts
    486
    Quote Originally Posted by quitefrankly View Post
    Pre-emptive comment: Yes it looks long. You see kids, people with fully formed brains can read quite fast. So, although to you, this is more text than you have seen in your entire life, and the nearest you ever got to reading a book, was Winnie the Pooh, this is a 3 minute read for most people.
    It's not a question of reading fast, it's a question of shoddily written repetitious material, and a lack of interest in a gigantic, multi-paragraph ☺☺☺☺☺ from someone who wants attention.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    118
    Hey, I bought it, so I mayaswell have finished it. If it took a long time I wouldn't have though. I was already bored by about mid way. But seeing as it was all over in less than a week, it was hardly a big deal to finish it...

    The sad thing, is that I bought it, finished it, and uninstally it within a week, and I'll never install it again. Its not often that happens for me.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by SliderFury View Post
    It's not a question of reading fast, it's a question of shoddily written repetitious material, and a lack of interest in a gigantic, multi-paragraph ☺☺☺☺☺ from someone who wants attention.
    I dont use paragraphs and you retarded kiddies cry about "walls of text hurting my eyez!!!". So I use loads of paragraphs and you retarded kiddies complain about too many. I can't win. Thats why I'm leaving now, so I don't have to read this ☺☺☺☺ from all you scum of the earth retards with barely enough brains to sit up straight.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    116
    Quite a lenghty bit of text just to tell us you did not enjoy the game. Also being sure to insult anyone who disagrees with you or mayabe even liked the game. Your analogies and comparisons were really not necessary. Why not just say you did not like the game and you think any anyone who did is an underage idiotic moron.


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New York F*CKIN CITY YEEEEAH! lol
    Posts
    486
    Quote Originally Posted by quitefrankly View Post
    I dont use paragraphs and you retarded kiddies cry about "walls of text hurting my eyez!!!". So I use loads of paragraphs and you retarded kiddies complain about too many. I can't win. Thats why I'm leaving now, so I don't have to read this ☺☺☺☺ from all you scum of the earth retards with barely enough brains to sit up straight.
    No no, you misunderstand. We don't want you to post at all when all that comes out of your mouth is immature ranting and misplaced aggression. Hope to not see you again

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    118
    I dont know, I don't hate everyone who enjoyed it. I think if you just wanted a fun shooter to play, then it was probably a good game. But really, if you just wanted a fun shooter, there are better ones than this. If you wanted something with a good story, there are better games than this. If you wanted something with great atmosphere, even this games predecessors where better. And if you wanted something with good combat, there are much better games than this.

    So I'm sure some people loved it anyway, and thats fine. But this isn't the gaming perfection everyone hypes it up to be. Far from it. And it shouldn't have been even vaguely resembled to the "shock" series. The hacking and audio logs where all dumbed down to such an extreme point, that they should have either just done away with it completely, or just had a button to press to automatically hack everything. They should have just given it another name. FPS and survival horror fans would lap it up, and the rest of us would know to ignore it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    118
    That was to gunr by the way. Slider can suck my dick.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    23
    You guys are practically as bad as the people on Gamefaqs. Doesn't anyone know what to do when they see a troll?
    Ignore.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1
    'NOTE TO FORUM MEMBERS: I will not be coming back. So you can save all your predictable dumbass comments.'

    A particularly stupid one too.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    london
    Posts
    15
    I don't think the OP is a troll at all- he's merely voicing his disappointment in a slightly rambling way but still intelligently. I understand what he's trying to say.

    SS2 is my favourite game, and I also love Bioshock. It'll be much more interesting if people reply to his post in a spirit of debate rather than a seemingly fanboyish "kthxbye" manner.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    119
    Although I think you were a bit harsh, I agree with the essence of what you said, with one caveat: It would ALL be forgiven if they released a patch enabling multiplayer coop, ala System Shock 2, and sent emails to all the elitist, friendless coop haters with a picture of two upraised middle fingers.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK, Wales
    Posts
    111
    Quote Originally Posted by quitefrankly View Post
    That was to gunr by the way. Slider can suck my dick.
    Would you kindly crymore... ROFL see what i did there? Pawuned.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by Nyctalopiac View Post
    You guys are practically as bad as the people on Gamefaqs. Doesn't anyone know what to do when they see a troll?
    Ignore.
    "Clearly people have an opinion that is contrary to the hype-based shallow fanboy mentality, so they're obviously wrong and inferior like this other group of people."

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    19

    Thumbs up

    I realy couldnt give a toss if you arent here to read my reply.

    It took me a bit longer than 3 minutes to read your post and hey, i know im not a fast reader mainly because i dont read very often, if i made the effort to read a book for half an hour before i went to bed then i know i'd be faster... but i dont.

    People like you ammuse me, i can only assume that you sucked so much ass at this game that you got frustrated at it... and decided to place the blame on Bioshock.

    with comments like:
    "So what if I run into a camera? I just stand there and give it the middle finger and die... 4 seconds later, I'm back there and all the bots are gone. So what if I run into a splicer.. right click left click and its dead."

    Ive played the game through on all normal and easy difficulty and havnt died once... im currently mid way through the hardest difficulty and i have yet to die...

    the goal is not to die... even though when you do, you instantly get ressurected at the nearest vita-chamber. Systemshock 2 had that feature aswell... yet you ☺☺☺☺☺ about it here.



    actually, whats with the personal insults towards us other gamers?... it aint our fault nor is it 2K's fault you disliked the game. Bioshock was made as a spiritual Successor to SS2, tailored to appease the true Systemshock fans who would appreciate the likeness between both games including the story, even though the two are very similar.

    oh yeah, i know that my grammar is bad and my use of the english language aint that hot either... its my choice, if you can read it then it shouldnt matter... if you cant then your comprehension skills are a bit rusty...

    Bioshock is a great game, 2K did an exclent job with the execution of the story, the "scary" bits were well concocted (having the player create them by themselves), the voice acting was very very well done, especially the voices of the little sisters, Andrew Ryan and also Fontain/Atlas

    the weapons were well modeled aswell as the deformities on the splicers
    (two thumbs up to the texturers there too)...


    you are a waste of Matter... go get hit by a truck, Would you kindly

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    29
    lol Baalzek

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    I realy couldnt give a toss if you arent here to read my reply.

    It took me a bit longer than 3 minutes to read your post and hey, i know im not a fast reader mainly because i dont read very often, if i made the effort to read a book for half an hour before i went to bed then i know i'd be faster... but i dont.

    People like you ammuse me, i can only assume that you sucked so much ass at this game that you got frustrated at it... and decided to place the blame on Bioshock.

    with comments like:
    "So what if I run into a camera? I just stand there and give it the middle finger and die... 4 seconds later, I'm back there and all the bots are gone. So what if I run into a splicer.. right click left click and its dead."

    Ive played the game through on all normal and easy difficulty and havnt died once... im currently mid way through the hardest difficulty and i have yet to die...

    the goal is not to die... even though when you do, you instantly get ressurected at the nearest vita-chamber. Systemshock 2 had that feature aswell... yet you ☺☺☺☺☺ about it here.



    actually, whats with the personal insults towards us other gamers?... it aint our fault nor is it 2K's fault you disliked the game. Bioshock was made as a spiritual Successor to SS2, tailored to appease the true Systemshock fans who would appreciate the likeness between both games including the story, even though the two are very similar.

    oh yeah, i know that my grammar is bad and my use of the english language aint that hot either... its my choice, if you can read it then it shouldnt matter... if you cant then your comprehension skills are a bit rusty...

    Bioshock is a great game, 2K did an exclent job with the execution of the story, the "scary" bits were well concocted (having the player create them by themselves), the voice acting was very very well done, especially the voices of the little sisters, Andrew Ryan and also Fontain/Atlas

    the weapons were well modeled aswell as the deformities on the splicers
    (two thumbs up to the texturers there too)...


    you are a waste of Matter... go get hit by a truck, Would you kindly
    Bravo! I agree completely (except maybe for the last line, everyone's entitled to their opinion although it wasn't anything more than what he was churning out). I played SS 1 and 2 and while I still enjoy those games I find almost everything about Bioshock to be more interesting and enjoyable.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    234
    Shut the ☺☺☺☺ up and die in a fire

    /thread

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    399
    Quantum reconstruction machines at least cost nanites so you were punished for using them...

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    U.K
    Posts
    886
    3 things:


    1. The original poster is NOT a troll, he is not purposely going against popular opinion only to cause flames... it is obvious he is actually dissapointed with the game (same as me and many others)

    2. The game is not as good as it was said to be. In many areas (technical, and gameplay)

    3. I agree with nearly all he wrote, but still think it's a 'good' game which is why I still hang around here to see news on patches and that which could lift it (technically).

    However, the OP is entitled to his opinion and if you actually read what he wrote instead of seeing it as 'some overlong rant against a game you love' then you may understand that he has valid points. To understand that though you really should have played SS2 and plenty of other *PC* FPS games to get a fair view of where Bioshock stands.

    I have to agree fully about the enemies, Splicers ARE as boring as all hell to deal with and to look at. They are very unimaginative once you get over the 'hey cool it's a ☺☺☺☺ed up human that turned junkie and is pissed at everyone but mainly the player for some reason'... they are not intimidating, the security is not intimidating and despatching either is a routine matter rather than a visceral challenge (and that's not just about difficulty it's about how you feel while despatching the enemies). If it wasn't for Big Daddies/Little Sister combos this game would feel as flat as a pancake in the enemy stakes and even those wear thin after the first handful.

    The whole 'rapture' premise doesn't live up to the hype or vision proposed by Ken Levine in previews, and the years we've waited for a 'spiritual successor' have mostly been wasted.

    Bioshock has many unique touches and glimpses of brilliance but it's spread very thinly over an otherwise very mundane and far too story led game. As i've said elsewhere, you have less interaction/action/fun per in game mile than a lot of other FPS. And I don't mean amount/number of enemies but the fact it doesn't present anything new to the player for large amounts of time, it seems artificially restricted to lengthen game time when you are in one small basic area.

    The respawning Splicers are an annoyance rather than a pleasure to encounter and are so stuffed with 'loot' that pressing 'E' on each and every one becomes completely worthless and could just as well happen automatically. Though searching of corpses has worked well in the past it all feels a bit old-hat these days, especially when that and messing around with vending machines seems to be about the only gameplay in the game (other than mediocre firefights which feel flimsy and lightweight because of poor animation/physics). IT feels like a consequence less world (other than in the story) and you are pretty much just moving through it to get to the end of the story and to look at the ocassionally pretty graphics, everything else is shallow gameplay dressed up to fool a 'majority' into in being revolutionary.

    The overhype was the worst thing about the game, as the OP said, had it been some unexpected game it would have been an 'ok' game or 'almost brilliant' but because of the expectations, former games and especially the stupid "glossing over the flaws" (technically and gameplay wise) reviews making ridiculous claims about it, it feels harder to forgive it's problems.

    Technically it is sub-par, the UE3 looks pretty enough (as to be expected) but even though they had that engine ready made to work with (with a few tweaks) they didn't quite beat the game into a fully cohesive/exciting 'world'. The best thing about Rapture is the OUTSIDE of the gameworld that you never get to (the skybox, or whatever technically passes for a skybox in UE3). That hints at the world but the interiors rarely enhance the atmosphere or make you feel like you are realy playing in this amazing world under the ocean. There are times when you get that feeling (sadly, mainly at the start where things look very good at first), but not often. The rest is just an interior shooter with awkward/uninteresting enemies and a lack of variety.

    I don't think many people are saying it's a 'bad' game but I for one am saying there are better games out there for gameplay. Theme and Story maybe Bioshock has most games beat (in the First Person Shooter genre only) and I really wanted to be pulled into the underwater world of Rapture because it appealed to me greatly, I had no resaon to suspect it would be a run of the mill shooter in action with only the story and occasionally nice graphics to pull it up out of the crowd.

    For me though, when I become used to the look of an environment, and I am 'in' the story, the only place left to keep me hooked is in the gameplay and the gameplay that is in Bioshock is... average. The only time I ever got a feeling of being in control in an exciting way was to lure enemies into the line of fire of hacked turrets, but this has been done before so was the least I expected. Other than that the whole vending machine/plasmids/upgrades stuff is fluff on top of a fairly plodding and uneventful game. They would have been great on top of killer gameplay but NOT in place of killer gameplay!

    Some areas of the game are really well done, graphically there are some of the best I've seen (if not the best) but it's never consistent. I detest that standard art-deco door with the gold trim (that aliases like a ☺☺☺☺☺) that is stuck in the middle of a blank grey wall one minute then round the corner and it's detail heaven with nice look graphics. This 'all over the place' design really ruins things and it would have been nicer to see it toned down overall if they couldn't keep it consistent and worry more about the layout and gameplay and keeping things immersive.

    And I won't promise to not come back so flame me if you must (for having a valid and well thought out opinion and experience to compare many games in the same genre) but I typically put insulters on ignore so it would be a waste.

    I'm still waiting to here compelling reasons why Bioshock's gameplay is in advance of most other AAA shooters out there without hearing reference to the story or the setting. Gameplay, Gameplay, Gameplay! Sadly it doesn't even feel on a par with the best gameplay wise due to the aforementioned lack of variety, unpolished feel and technical issues.

    A game has to be GOOD for me to give it 8/10 and that is what I give Bioshock. An 8/10 game for me will never be a favourite game or one that I feel lived up to the hype, expectation and premise it had.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New York F*CKIN CITY YEEEEAH! lol
    Posts
    486
    Quote Originally Posted by quitefrankly View Post
    That was to gunr by the way. Slider can suck my dick.
    I would, but you have to take it out of your own ass first

  24. #24
    What is wrong with people? Why should anyone pay attention or read what this dude says? His first comment is to insult those who would spend time reading his "disappointment" and to inform everyone that he will not be showing them the courtesy of reading their comments. Why? Because everyone is is a sheep and an idiot. So I'm suppose to browse his post for content and give him a fair hearing? Why? Out of the goodness of my heart? Because I want to read yet another diatribe on how anyone that likes the game is a fanboy or any other amusingly ironic, trendy and sheep like "against the grain" manifestos? Its amazing how precious little individuality these dissenters have while spewing nonsense about everyone else being idiots and sheep. Irony is certainly lost on these people. Ignoring that trail of, no one is obligated to respond or give the benefit of the doubt to anyone who announces quite clearly that they don't value your opinion, will listen to you, and consider you an idiot. Lamenting that this guy is not getting a proper reading is ludicrous.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New York F*CKIN CITY YEEEEAH! lol
    Posts
    486
    Quote Originally Posted by atlasshrugged View Post
    What is wrong with people? Why should anyone pay attention or read what this dude says? His first comment is to insult those who would spend time reading his "disappointment" and to inform everyone that he will not be showing them the courtesy of reading their comments. Why? Because everyone is is a sheep and an idiot. So I'm suppose to browse his post for content and give him a fair hearing? Why? Out of the goodness of my heart? Because I want to read yet another diatribe on how anyone that likes the game is a fanboy or any other amusingly ironic, trendy and sheep like "against the grain" manifestos? Its amazing how precious little individuality these dissenters have while spewing nonsense about everyone else being idiots and sheep. Irony is certainly lost on these people. Ignoring that trail of, no one is obligated to respond or give the benefit of the doubt to anyone who announces quite clearly that they don't value your opinion, will listen to you, and consider you an idiot. Lamenting that this guy is not getting a proper reading is ludicrous.
    yeah, but it's still amusing to poke them and watch them lash back at you as if you threated their livelihood

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    118
    Splitting this into two posts:

    Thanks to those who agreed with me. The rest of you are in attack mode like some pissy 9 year old, deeply hurt that I disliked the game you thought was teh besteszt gaem evar!, so you can all just suck it down.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    It took me a bit longer than 3 minutes to read your post and hey, i know im not a fast reader mainly because i dont read very often,
    Thats ok. Atleast you didn't ☺☺☺☺☺ about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    People like you ammuse me, i can only assume that you sucked so much ass at this game that you got frustrated at it... and decided to place the blame on Bioshock.
    Hey, I can assure you... I did not suck at this game. On the contrary, this game sucked against me, and that was a major problem.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    "So what if I run into a camera? I just stand there and give it the middle finger and die... 4 seconds later, I'm back there and all the bots are gone. So what if I run into a splicer.. right click left click and its dead."

    Ive played the game through on all normal and easy difficulty and havnt died once... im currently mid way through the hardest difficulty and i have yet to die...

    the goal is not to die... even though when you do, you instantly get ressurected at the nearest vita-chamber. Systemshock 2 had that feature aswell... yet you ☺☺☺☺☺ about it here.
    Ok, first off, I only played the game once. I played it on hardest difficulty. I died maybe a dozen times or less, during the entire game. Which is quite an achievement when you see the later stages of the game. My comment about giving the finger to a camera, is not because I am a dummy who stands there and dies... I rarely died, and I was only cought by a camera a couple of times in the entire game. The problem... is that it doesn't matter if you do get cought.. You respawn back in the convenient, nearby, respawn tube thing, and there is no penalty. Infact, you are even given a bunch of health and energy...

    I've played almost every shooter available to this date. I found this game far too easy, even on hard difficulty. You seem to have got the exact opposite impression from my post, which makes me think you are completely ☺☺☺☺ing retarded to be honest. (Maybe you SHOULD read before you go to bed?). But anyway, the point is... you could complete this entire game with just the damn wrench.. You beat stuff till it dies, and if you ever die... you would just respawn with a chunk of health and energy, and off you go again. There is no challenge, no risk, no threat, and no tension at all.

    And no, the System Shock games where not like that. Particularly the first one, but the second one was fairly tough too. It was different in 4 important ways. First off, to respawn, it used "nanites", and there was a limited supply of them in Bioshock, it costs nothing.
    Secondly, the respawn chambers where fewer and further apart. So you where actually scared of dying, because you could end up respawning miles back. Finding a new chamber was something quite special.
    Thirdly, you had to manually power it up. They even arranged this into a sort of mini-quest way. So when you first explore a new area, a wise player would work on firing up that spawn chamber as soon as possible. In Bioshock it didn't matter. You just automatically respawn at wherever is the nearest.
    And lastly, all items in the System Shock games, suffer from damage, and ammo is more rare. So if you ever died and had to respawn, you would likely have to use extra ammo to get back to where you where originally... and your items would all degrade in that time too. On the higher difficulty levels, this was a big deal. In Bioshock, the issue didn't even exist.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    actually, whats with the personal insults towards us other gamers?... it aint our fault
    So ignore it then if its not aimed at you, dumbass.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    nor is it 2K's fault you disliked the game.
    I never said it was... They are the publisher. IG are the developer, and its them who I am aiming at.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    Bioshock was made as a spiritual Successor to SS2, tailored to appease the true Systemshock fans who would appreciate the likeness between both games including the story, even though the two are very similar.
    They failed miserably. It barely resembled SS at all. I suspect that most of the original SS and SS2 players, will likely feel let down by Bioshock. And modern games would have bought it, even if it had a different name and no resemblence to SS.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    Bioshock is a great game,
    Its not. Its a mediocre game with great production values.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    2K did an exclent job with the execution of the story,
    2K didn't do anything, they are the publisher. And no, the story was mediocre.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    the "scary" bits were well concocted (having the player create them by themselves), the voice acting was very very well done, especially the voices of the little sisters, Andrew Ryan and also Fontain/Atlas
    It wasn't scary at all to me. The voice acting was very good, but the little sisters are one of the most annoying things I have ever heard, ever. And Fontain's american accent is one of the phoniest accents I've ever heard.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    the weapons were well modeled aswell as the deformities on the splicers
    (two thumbs up to the texturers there too)...
    Maybe so. Doesn't help the fact that they where boring though. Most FPS players have played a thousand games with the exact same weapons in before. The very fact that games like Halflife 2 and FEAR (years old now) where better than Bioshock, speaks volumes about Bioshock.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kastor View Post
    you are a waste of Matter... go get hit by a truck, Would you kindly
    Thats exactly why I wasn't going to come back. This forum is 99% retarded little kids. The worst thing about it though, is that when you are all older, you will still be ☺☺☺☺ing idiots. I feel sorry for the normal members of this forum (the few that exist..), if they actually need anything from this forum.

    Quote Originally Posted by madcat75 View Post
    Shut the ☺☺☺☺ up and die in a fire

    /thread
    You know, for every special needs case like yourself, that wishes death upon someone they've never met, I am sure something very bad will happen to you, or your family.

    Quote Originally Posted by greylantern View Post
    1. The original poster is NOT a troll, he is not purposely going against popular opinion only to cause flames... it is obvious he is actually dissapointed with the game (same as me and many others)

    2. The game is not as good as it was said to be. In many areas (technical, and gameplay)
    Thanks. And bingo. Its not a terrible game, but its bad value for money, and its no way near as good as it was hyped up to be.

    Quote Originally Posted by greylantern View Post
    if you actually read what he wrote instead of seeing it as 'some overlong rant against a game you love' then you may understand that he has valid points. To understand that though you really should have played SS2 and plenty of other *PC* FPS games to get a fair view of where Bioshock stands.
    You maybe shouldn't bother defending me or yourself though. I read the rest of your reply and its really great. This forum doesn't deserve people like you, and most of these idiots wouldn't even understand most of what you say. Good luck anyway.

    Quote Originally Posted by greylantern View Post
    so stuffed with 'loot' that pressing 'E' on each and every one becomes completely worthless and could just as well happen automatically. Though searching of corpses has worked well in the past it all feels a bit old-hat these days
    Yes. This is a pet peave of mine in other games too. But really, atleast in the SS games, you had to do some inventory management and stuff. Not the most exciting thing in the world... but atleast I had to actually think about what I was picking up, what I was going to keep, and what would be most valuable to me at various points etc.. I remember saving a good melee weapon for certain enemies, and then the rest where firearms and grenades of different types. In Bioshock, its just about spamming E. They even threw in the cigarettes which was a stupid design decision, because all it achieved was to make the E spamming, more labourious. But yeah, I agree with everything you say basically.

    Quote Originally Posted by greylantern View Post
    The overhype was the worst thing about the game, as the OP said, had it been some unexpected game it would have been an 'ok' game or 'almost brilliant' but because of the expectations, former games and especially the stupid "glossing over the flaws" (technically and gameplay wise) reviews making ridiculous claims about it, it feels harder to forgive it's problems.
    Bingo.

    Something I forgot to say in my big rant, is this... 6 months or a year from now, people will be playing Alan Wake, Unreal Tourny 2007, Crysis, AOC, Hellgate London, Spore, etc... Bioshock will be a distant memory. Personally, it will be filed in my head under, "just some average shooter I played sometime". Infact, I can feel myself forgetting it already... when relatively unkown games (like Sniper Elite etc..) are still quite fresh in my mind.

    This was not true of the System Shock games. Like I said, the original SS game is about 13 years old now, and I still remember it well. Its a classic. It was absolutely, hugely revolutionary at the time. Other game developers must have thought, "Uh oh", when they saw that. Everyone who played it back then, respects it, and remembers it.


    Quote Originally Posted by greylantern View Post
    I don't think many people are saying it's a 'bad' game but I for one am saying there are better games out there for gameplay.
    Totally. Its sad that more people don't realise that, and instead of trying to attack me with their stupid, "please die" comments, they actually go and play more games, and see for themselves... There really are, atleast a dozen shooters, which are better than Bioshock. Bioshock has the most recent graphics, but everything else has been done better in other games. And thats just the FPS genre..


    Quote Originally Posted by greylantern View Post
    I'm still waiting to here compelling reasons why Bioshock's gameplay is in advance of most other AAA shooters out there
    It just isn't. Don't keep waiting You'll never get a satisfactory answer to that, because it just isn't. It has great graphics (although they are inconsistent like you said). The story I thought was mediocre, and the setting was decent (but badly realised). Other than that though, its actually quite bad. Crappy physics, crappy AI, crappy animations, no team mates to control, no ambushes, no nothin.. It really is a step backwards in terms of gameplay. There are countless games better than this if you're after some good gameplay, and I'm sure you know them as well as I do, and therefore how badly Bioshock stands up to them. Its the modern age man... All the resources go towards shiny graphics to attract these dumbass people like moths.... and the gameplay itself is like some secondary objective..


    Quote Originally Posted by atlasshrugged View Post
    What is wrong with people?
    They are idiots.

    Quote Originally Posted by atlasshrugged View Post
    His first comment is to insult those who would spend time reading his "disappointment"
    Wrong. It was to make it clear I was posting how I felt, like some feedback, and I know this forum well enough to know what to expect. I expected all the "plz die kthx lolzlzz" comments, so thats why I started with the little disclaimer. If you are too dumb to separate yourself from that crowd, then ☺☺☺☺ you as much as the other tards here.

    Quote Originally Posted by atlasshrugged View Post
    Why? Out of the goodness of my heart? Because I want to read yet another diatribe on how anyone that likes the game is a fanboy or any other amusingly ironic,
    No. Either you are meant to not read it. Go to school. Play some other games. Read something else. Or read it and then comment on it if you have the urge to reply. But you, you are special... you did neither. You didn't just ignore it, but you didn't read it either. You read the first few sentences, assumed the tone of it, and then posted your "comments". Congratulations. You are a dumbass.

  28. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by quitefrankly View Post
    Its not. Its a mediocre game with great production values....
    ...Congratulations. You are a dumbass.
    tl;dr... How do you come up with all this stuff? How old exactly are you? How can you have so much free time to both play the game, and probably other games as well, and still write posts as long as my arm! No body reads them.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    18
    IRT OP:

    Well to each his own, I personally think the game is fantastic; a breath of fresh air in a stale genre. The game system is very inventive and rich resulting in almost untold combat possibilities.

    It's impossible to make a game that every one will love.

    It doesn't make your opinion any less valid, but for the record you are vastly in the minority.

    If the difficulty was of some concern there is a decent mod out (a copy/paste from another post):

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    *This is a difficulty mod for Bioshock made to increase its difficulty on easy, normal and hard modes*

    *This mod was released in September 9, 2007*

    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=G16MQ8DQ

    Bioshock Difficulty Mod made for those that really want a challenge!'

    1) Wrench does 1/5 the amount of damage it used to do!

    2) Rosie's have 2x more health!

    3) Bouncers have 3x more health! (The first Big Daddies are not effected)

    4) Ammo and money are alot more scarce!

    5) Plasmids and Tonics now cost quadruple what they used to cost!

    6) Most Gatherers Garden have 9 supplies of Health, Eve and Genetic Slots Upgrade!

    7) Harvesting Little Sisters now give 400 Adam, saving gives half. Have all the tasty adam you can drink!

    8) Most Circus of Values Vending Machines no longer sell ammo or AutoHacks!

    9) Most Bandito Vending Machines sell AutoHacks!

    10) Vending Machines and Health Stations are a lot harder to hack!

    11) All Health Stations yield a free First Aid Kit if you break them. Can be broken with a wrench!

    12) Many Splicers have alot more health.

    13) Vending machines now only sell 4 films per roll.

    14) Slight tone down to the crossbow's power.

    15) Chemical Thrower does damage with every hit now for all ammo types.

    16) Thug Splicers on Welcome to Rapture have less HP.

    17) Items from Circus of Values and Bandito now cost double.

    18) Most likely compatible with future versions of Bioshock.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Hope this helps, if not try another game you do like,

    Regards,

    Tony.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    U.K
    Posts
    886
    Quote Originally Posted by SanalFikret View Post
    ...and still write posts as long as my arm! No body reads them.
    I did. I can read more than a paragraph before my mind shuts down (or blocks out the truth).

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    130
    Hello,

    Just a warning first : this post is my personal opinion. I'll try to keep it short and polite, please do the same if you answer it.

    I just had the opportunity to test that game at a friend's on his X360 for about an hour and a half, and I must say that I, too, am disappointed. Considering all the hype and the good (if not perfect) reviews it got I was hopping it'd be a lot better.

    Simply put, here are the things I liked :
    - It has good graphics. I'd say that, for me, they're on par with HL2/Doom 3. But not better. I've been left with the feeling that the Unreal Engine 3 is under-used by this game. The models and textures are good, even if I didn't liked the "Art-Deco" style of the late 50s.
    - It has great voice acting. Now this is probably one of the best voice acting I've heard in a long time.

    And here are the things I disliked :
    - The atmosphere isn't scary, or even just oppressive, at all. Once I got past the surprise effect of the first ambushes I never had that oppressive feeling I was supposed to for being the lone survivor of an airplane's crash that discovers and underwater city filled with agressive mutants.
    - The story isn't that original. Being the lone survivor of an accident has been done thousands times. Ending up in an isolated place, that no one has discovered before, too. And finally being confronted with crazy mutated humans is completely overused (but I'll admit that it's hard to come up with ideas for new ennemies).
    - The weapons are very common, ammunitions are too frequent, and so are first aid kits, bandages and so on. So much that they had to put an artificial limit on how many items of the same kind you can carry at the same time without even justifying it with an inventory system.
    - The "Plasmids" are just spells renamed, and the Eve is just like mana. Hell, it's status bar is even blue like that of mana in most RPG games
    - I died once, just to try what death looked like, and was disappointed to see that it basically had no incidence.
    - "Hacking" turrets or vending machines was way too easy.
    - I never had the feeling of being left alone in a big underwater city. I guess that comes from the fact that most of the time I only had one road opened to me, which I needed to go to push on a switch to open up the subsequent road. Basically it's Doom all over again on that specific point : open door, kill monster(s), find switch to unlock the next door, repeat.
    - There are some movement options that I miss, namely leaning.

    Maybe I didn't play enough (I have only seen a BD twice, and never fought one), but in that state, and considering the whole DRM problem, I'll probably never regret not buying that game, as I consider it to be an "ok" game.

    If I had to give it a note :
    - Graphics : 7/10. It's good, but not superior to what I'm waiting for for that generation of games.
    - Sound : 9/10. That's the most impressive part of the game. It's almost perfect.
    - Gameplay : 4/10. There aren't any blatent flaws, except for the leaning move that I really miss, but there isn't anything original either.
    - Scenario : 2/10. Completely unoriginal.
    - Atmosphere : 3/10. There are some points where I was surprised. Or that I thought that it was scary, or disturbing. But I never had the feeling of being trapped in an hostile underwater city.
    - Multiplayer : 0/10. Just no multiplayer at all.

    - Global : 5/10. It does the job but that's pretty much all there is to it.

  32. #32
    - The story isn't that original. Being the lone survivor of an accident has been done thousands times. Ending up in an isolated place, that no one has discovered before, too. And finally being confronted with crazy mutated
    - Scenario : 2/10. Completely unoriginal.
    Maybe I didn't play enough (I have only seen a BD twice, and never fought one)
    You didn't fought a Big Daddy yet and you are jugding the game scenario...? And other aspects aswell?

    Sorry, but I could fire up an RPG game, play for 1-2 hours and tell that being a boy that fights with a sword (or starting in a village, w/e) isn't original and give the the game 2/10 for scenario.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by Snuffixer View Post
    You didn't fought a Big Daddy yet and you are jugding the game scenario...? And other aspects aswell?
    Sorry but, nowadays, if I'm not caught up by the game right at the beginning, I'm not incited to play it for a long time, and that's especially true for FPSes. I've played that kind of games since "Wolfenstein" (the first one, not "Return...") and seen a lot of them (to cite just a few : Doom 1, 2 & 3, Quake 1, 2 & 3, RtCW, Deus-Ex 1 & 2, Unreal 1 & 2, UT, UT2K3, UT2K4, HL, HL2, CS, CS:Source, Battlefield, Battlefield2, Swat4, Rainbow5 & 6, CoD 1 & 2, MoH, Max Payne 1 & 2, Serious Sam 1, SE & 2, Painkiller, System Shock 1 &2 ...) so I might be a bit hard when judging the quality and interest of a FPS.

    Quote Originally Posted by Snuffixer View Post
    Sorry, but I could fire up an RPG game, play for 1-2 hours and tell that being a boy that fights with a sword (or starting in a village, w/e) isn't original and give the the game 2/10 for scenario.
    To be fair I'd give most games a note ranging from 2/10 to 5/10 on Scenario. I still have to find a FPS with an original one nowadays. The last one I can remember is Max Payne, and even that still was a bit of a cliché (poor guy who had his wife and kid murdered wants to get revenge on the people who did it), but at least it wasn't overused like the "survivor in hostile environment who has to defeat the Big Bad Guy to get out alive" or "you are the world's last hope, go kick the bad guys' asses" are. And as you rightfully note, the same is true of most RPGs.

    As I said that's my opinion, I won't force you to agree with it. I'll try to get my friend to lend me the game to play it a bit more and see if my opinion improves.

  34. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by quitefrankly View Post
    Pre-emptive comment: Yes it looks long. You see kids, people with fully formed brains can read quite fast. So, although to you, this is more text than you have seen in your entire life, and the nearest you ever got to reading a book, was Winnie the Pooh, this is a 3 minute read for most people.


    I dont t hink its peoples attension spans that you should be calling into question here, i personally cant read all of that bickering and whining in one day myself.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    South Wales
    Posts
    1,116
    when reading long posts i usually stop at the first stupid or inaccurate statement.

    if that happens to be in the first line/paragraph,then i save 5 minutes reading the rest

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by AJ Rimmer View Post
    when reading long posts i usually stop at the first stupid or inaccurate statement.

    if that happens to be in the first line/paragraph,then i save 5 minutes reading the rest
    Imagine how long it took them to write it.

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by Grommell View Post
    Imagine how long it took them to write it.
    It doesn't take that long if you know how to type efficiently and what you want to write.

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    294
    Going to save myself the trouble of reading all of this ...

    I played System Shock 2 originally because i'm a Sci-fi ☺☺☺☺☺.

    I got an Ego-Maniacal(?) Articificial Intelligence orchestrating an ellaborate yet deliciously evil plan to destroy/conquer the universe.

    Bioshock drew me in due to how awesome System Shock 2 was.

    I got a Dystopian Anarchic Society at a critical point of decay with particular focus on the "Human Suffering" aspect, and the wills of two great figures clashing in a society that was all about Darwinism.

    Tbh ... There may be similar Gameplay Elements, but they are very different products to me.

    And i'm happy with both.

    Sorry you aren't.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,759
    Quote Originally Posted by quitefrankly View Post
    I dont use paragraphs and you retarded kiddies cry about "walls of text hurting my eyez!!!". So I use loads of paragraphs and you retarded kiddies complain about too many. I can't win. Thats why I'm leaving now, so I don't have to read this ☺☺☺☺ from all you scum of the earth retards with barely enough brains to sit up straight.
    Not only do you not come off as being intelligent, but you also sound quite disgruntled. Writing to insult everyone in the forum who has and will misunderstand you is completely inappropriate. Enjoy your ban. Good afternon,

    PrivateJoker

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    171
    tldr

    12345

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •