Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Did anyone upgrade to Vista for DX 10 for Bioshock?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3

    Did anyone upgrade to Vista for DX 10 for Bioshock?

    Just curious. I have Bioshock for the PC and am wondering if DX 10 makes a big difference for the game. I hate to pay nearly 100 bucks to upgrade JUST for Bioshock... but I want to hear from others first.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    14
    IMO not enough of an improvement to justify the upgrade.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    316
    If you are expecting to be wowed by Bioshock's DirectX 10 graphics in the same fashion that future games like Crysis or the Flight Simulator X Expansion will, you probably will be disappointed. There aren't that many differences (because Unreal Engine 3 was originally designed when there wasn't a DirectX 10) and the differences that do exist are subtle. The big things are softer shadows, soft particles and ripples in the water, the differences of which you can see at this URL : http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/...ance/page6.asp.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    316
    Also another batch of screenshots here : http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/...ance/page4.asp

  5. #5
    How would anybody really tell.
    Not many people here would of actually played the game both with and without dx10.
    I'm personnaly running the game on Dx10 using 8800 320 gts.
    And there is no question it looks great, but wouldn't of thought my same specs using dx9 would make much difference?
    You may see more of a difference in some areas and none in others.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by NESv1 View Post
    Just curious. I have Bioshock for the PC and am wondering if DX 10 makes a big difference for the game. I hate to pay nearly 100 bucks to upgrade JUST for Bioshock... but I want to hear from others first.
    Played it with DX10 and DX0.

    DX10 only gives better smoke and water.
    No great step forward, you easily can go without it.

    So I choosed DX9 to be able to enable AA (not possible with DX10) and to use chabge of FOV with Racers tool.

    These 2 points are much more important to me than the very little advantage of DX10.

    However this is not surprising as Bioshock was not developed for DX10 but DX9, they just were using 2 DX10-features that were easy to use, ..I asume.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK, Wales
    Posts
    111
    Hell no DX10 sucks.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    115
    On DX10 my 8800GTX will use all of its pipelines, so there is a considerable difference. However, Vista is also a big resource hog and I just don't like it, so I don't think I will.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    27
    Run both XP and Vista on identical machines at home, definitely no justifiable reason to upgrade to DX10 for this game, DX9 looks practically identical and runs faster. If I didn't have access to Vista licences I wouldn't have bothered with it yet, maybe when the Crysis demo hits it will be a different story.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •