Which makes you the most prominent king holder at the moment
Which makes you the most prominent king holder at the moment
Petition that random become footsoldiers
I vote that Glenn be pushed into the Hall of Fame for the King of FFA title due to his limited availability.(Its been 2 months since the titles conception and it was only played for twice.) G lenn won the second match and hasnt been available to defend it since so I think its been long enough. I would move that ITZ DENI3D, being the titles creator plays for the title with the first 2-3 opponents(forum members) he comes across to name the new king. That way this gets back into circulation!
No hard fealings glenn, the type of guy you are I have a feeling you would agree with this sentiment.
I had a wild day yesterday for this King of Hated title. 4 times I defended for it in a best of 5 vs DigitalPackrat 3-2, Blades of Dritzz 3-1, Mawpawk, 3-1 and Da Xcutionerz 3-1. I had my best games vs Xcutionerz as he is the one that gave me a run for my money in two games that I definitely wasn't sure I was going to win. One of the games went on for 3 1/2 hours early in the morning and we both needed to go to bed but wouldn't because of our ego's for this title. I know some out there think it is a joke and relatively it is but indeed this is the most hated civilization around. Anyone who denies that is ignorant, retarded and practically a moron!
p.s I hope to see Jack that my (1) in hated has become (5) and that Bottom Tier becomes (5) unless that doesn't count how many times defended as I think that is something noteworthy to note.
Hey I bumped the old endless champion thread because its a cool idea. Jack mentioned we should redo it. I know duke started a similar thread that might have been too lofty with 10 required games. Anyways, mawpawks original idea(endless champions) or a new title...(KING of KINGs) was that its a best of 5, and you have to have a king title to challenge the current king of kings. Sounds pretty cool to me. Who should the first challenge be? Well I did some tallying before I even thought of this and heres the top 10 of King Titles of all time.
Ill be honest Im pretty sure that multi has 2 lower tier title defenses that he never posted about 2 months back(the first time we played for it). Morte porbably played the least amount of games but I think its obvious who should have the right to play for the first King of Kings if you guys like this idea. I guess the current king would make the rules on civ choice or we could use dukes ideas from his kings thread. Anways, I think mawpawk should play for the first king of kings title and any current king holder should be able to challenge him. Sound Cool??Code:Forum Member Total King Titles Mawpawk 70 Grizz 21 Digital 18 Scottie 16 Thrasher 15 Morte 13 Multi 12 ITZ 8 REM 6 Prey/Glenn 5
I dunno,, maybe the king of kings would choose two of the current king title tiers and the challenger can choose from those two in which he would want to challenge them too. Or they just challenge to any of the sets of civs that has a king title. best of 5 or 7. regular tourney rules apply of course. Unless somebody has a better idea.
Grizz - nice one. I have 2 or 3 times started to build a leaderboard for the king titles, but always got side tracked/ran outta time.
I've copied yours to the top post. Still to update, I think.
EDIT: Added MPB's ffa title to leader-board and I think it's all up to date.
I think I tallied it up right when I did it because I know how you do that. Multi was asking for 4 wins to be added to hated and 1 to be added to the lower tier but I only but I only added 3 to his overall record because he was already listed as the king of those titles so I had already added those two when I tallied it. If anyone is curious how to do the tally just count how many current king titles one has....then add how many hall of fames they have for the total # of times they won the title. Once you lose the title your current hall of fame goes up one as your name is removed from said title.
I know multi likes that leaderboard!....hes tied with Morte!.....and everyone above him on the list is basically a living legend of civ......welcome to the fold....hmmm multi should actually be at 14 now so hes past morte.....he and itz played for the lower tier last night, Ill use my investigative skills right quick and point out that if itz had won, it would already be posted whereas since multi defended he would be more likely to continue playing and update the post today......so I know multi won that......good job multi
....on a side note.....any other thoughts on the King of Kings anybody?......multi prey mawpawk Itz and packrat seem to compete for them the most......so they should be the ones voting Id say....
Can anyone challenge for the kings?
hada brain fart, im seeing no reason for a king of kings 2 accept the challenge ...so how about the challenger has 2 put his own king title on the line ...? also would like 2 prepose a best of 5, through all tiers. i did wanna include the footsoldier tier and hated zulu, but im thinking best of 7 may be 2 long? or would the people like that?
Just for clearness mawpawk is saying that he thinks it should be a best of 5...and that each game be from one of the tiers...not of best of 5 for each tier....I agree thats straight....
About challengin:g its not cool at all if you lose a king title without playing for it so the present king title isnt on the line when playing the king of kings.....but if by put your title on the line you mean the king ofk ings should get to challenge back for whatever title they have after...thats fine and seems expected to me....
finally .....the king of kings has to accept the challenge from any current king holder or he is no true king he is just a pansy...a simple placeholder until the true king claims his rightful place......
and finally finally......you need a challenger before you become the first king of kings dont you maw.....I propose that I challenge you since I have held the most king titles second to you.....although truthfully the first king that runs into maw can challenge for the right to be the first king of kings
i think its a great idea to put your title on the line if you are challenging the king of kings, and no i dont mean challenging back i meant if the king o kings has 2 put his title up then the challenger should not be a pansy or a title ogre and put his measly title up,or he is no true challenger and not worthy of audience.
Hey so mawpawk and I just played for the first king of kings. Mawpawk was thinking that King of Kings is a gay name and we were thinking "The Centurion King" or "King Kong" or something might be a good title. Does anybody agree with that. We wanted to ask before we made the thread so feedback would be cool. Also mawpawk was second guessing his idea about having to put a title up to be able to play because it might deter people from playing so thoughts on that?
Simply 'THE CZAR' or stolen from digital- 'supreme overlord'. I like king kong too
Nobody wants to respond!!...arg help us think of a cool name.....another one would be the Apex King.....the apex predator in the wild is the organism at the top of his food chain....the organism that is prey to nothing....examples being the great killer whale of the oceans(killer whales are actually large dolphins btw....Orcinus Orca of the family Delphinidae, although all dolphins are actually toothed whales, Suborder Odontoceti), the saltwater alligator,...oh....and then theres the Grizzly Bear.
Think everything is up to date. as always, let me know if different.
PS3 guys - feel free to comment on layout/set-up/inclusion of your part - post no.2 at the top.
You do a great job here jack thanx u man thank u.
No lie, jack continuously proves how the commitment of a few players can keep civ fun and exciting.
Cheers for the props guys.
Hmmnn... Got myself a bit confused...
I have put Multi at 26 on the leaderbaord, but gone back and counted just 25... don't know if I've missed a hall of fame entry or put 1 too much on the leaderboard?
Yea that FFA kind of skewes the results because since its only one game they will play like 4 or 5 in a row. Multi has been on a hot streak though
Looks like Multi is finally as good as he thought he was
Multi - you should make a post about what you have done to change your strategy - or we could do a multi strategy topic in revcast![]()
Hey jack ill just post here to make it easier on you.
Just defended King of Queens
My Egypt kill maws spanish before he settles
My russia whollup his russia good
Just took the bottom tier from maw
My mongols take india early to stomp his russians
My French smack down his Mongols like little flies. GGs
I am bottom tier king
Yessir!....just defended twice against multi
Bottom Tier.
My mongols swat his mongols
My French slaslaslap his french
Bottom Tier
My Mongols KO his Russians
My rFench cremate his Mongols.
2 more defenses for blades
Ok so I beat star 2-0 for middle tier king (ps3) don't know which thread you guys are using for results..... Bit confusing.
curious........
even curiouser......
Hmmn...interesting - so you can actually bump a sticky![]()
This thread looks amazing Jack. Great work fella. You forgot one title though. King of the Civ Rev World of Admin which of course my friend is you. I can't see too many people challenging you for it though! ;-)
LOL, good one Liam but ummm Packrat has been trying to get at you for the Civ Rev League and you haven't been responding... whats going on? You can take this over to that thread as I don't want to flood this thread with other thread issues.