Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Devs: Any plans on seriously fixing Cifailization 5?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    308

    Thumbs down Devs: Any plans on seriously fixing Cifailization 5?

    The list of problems and fails with Civ 5 could go on for pages, but I like to point a few: The inability to have option to have a "closed empire", i.e; not to accept visitors from other nations. The veritable spam of useless contacts from other civs especially when you are trying to wage war against yet another rabid dog attacking you for no reason is grating, to say the least. Same goes for the announcement "An unknown civ has told unknown civ bla bla bal" WTF! Jesus F Christ enough with the goddam spam already! Is it really too hard to remove such a stupid retarded silly useless thing from the game? And whatta hell is up with the Polynesian UU ability to move away from an attack? Talk about not testing stuff before release... Compare that unit to for example the Egyptean UU, lol... "Slight" difference. I have had the Polynesian slinger move away before three successive attacks, so they end up retreating from certain death at my gates to back to their own cultural borders, lmfao... Only the stuff that is wrong and a lot of what could be remedied easily can literally fill pages, not to even mention the superfail that the multiplayer is, and still no hot-seat either. GG Firaxis /irony.

    The game is just full of ☺☺☺☺ like this. All I wish for at this point really is for Firaxis to fire the fail team that made this piece of crap and make a new proper civ. Keep the hexes, and 1 unit per tile, those are good changes. Especially hexes.

    Oh, and while you start to ponder on starting anew, would it be too hard to ask to make the forests animated again, and add some coniferous forests.

    And listen to your effin' playerbase for once.

    And no, I do not expect a reply.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Cardiff, UK
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by Devilbound View Post
    Any plans on fixing Cifailization 5?
    I see what you did there DERP DERP.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    652
    Quote Originally Posted by Devilbound View Post
    /irony.
    Oh cool, I thought you might've even been serious there for a second.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    moscow
    Posts
    27
    there are plans to make money on selling new civs

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    308
    Quote Originally Posted by Jinzor View Post
    I see what you did there DERP DERP.
    Graz, awesome perception you got, here, have a cookie!

    Quote Originally Posted by Lariono View Post
    there are plans to make money on selling new civs
    Yea, awesome! \o/

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    236
    The Slinger is the Mayan UU, not the Polynesian.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    308
    Quote Originally Posted by PhailRaptor View Post
    The Slinger is the Mayan UU, not the Polynesian.
    Oh ye thats right, thanks for the correction. Anyways, I meant the slinger as maybe could be seen by the description of the unique ability.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    158
    They sure are very busy making a serious patch.... didnt you see the Korean Localization update?? LOL

    I agree, again and allready for months that this company is digging its own grave! First of all, this game has to many flaws like the OP said. Multiplayer still isnt fixed! Diplomacy and barbarians laughable.Etc etc etc.

    But what i dislike the most off all is the lack of communications towards the fan base!

    How about that job opening for the multiplayer part? Did they found allready somebody after a 6 months search? Absurd!!

    Man im so ☺☺☺☺ing furious that every time i want to post a message on this board the more i get in rage mode so i have to delete half again.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Free State Bavaria
    Posts
    2,092
    Quote Originally Posted by PhailRaptor View Post
    The Slinger is the Mayan UU, not the Polynesian.
    Quote Originally Posted by Devilbound View Post
    Oh ye thats right, thanks for the correction. Anyways, I meant the slinger as maybe could be seen by the description of the unique ability.
    No, not even that is right. The Slinger is the Inca UU. Jeez, what a crap thread!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by tfordp View Post
    No, not even that is right. The Slinger is the Inca UU. Jeez, what a crap thread!
    Eh, 4 in the morning.... Concentration levels low......

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    428
    Quote Originally Posted by PhailRaptor View Post
    The Slinger is the Mayan UU, not the Polynesian.
    Although it would be cool to have the Mayan civ, the slinger is the Incan UU...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,160
    You do now talking respectively and politely is more postive than talking rudely.

    Also for someone ranting about a game that is not well made, you sure have alot of spelling mistakes.

    Oh and before you say I am a Civ V fan boi, I am not, I complain and give Civ V very harsh critisim, but I do it in a more mature, professional manner of doing it. So sad to read how you had to say it. You really can't be taken seriously. Nothing really funny in your post at all.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Cardiff, UK
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by devilbound View Post
    Gratz, awesome perception you got! Here, have a cookie!
    Awwww YEAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    7
    Yep, this game is straight doo doo. I wonder how much longer this thread will last b4 a dev sees and closes it. Maybe a while considering how "important" fan input is. They must monitor these boards non-stop...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •