I really laughed at that. :p
Type: Posts; User: mandead
I really laughed at that. :p
Khmer, Berbers, Timurids and Majapahit would be great. :)
Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité, ou la Mort!
Well, clearly Byzantium and Austria were plausible choices anyway, and both have plenty of well-known male leaders. I mean that choosing a civ because of a particular female leader, or indeed...
Choosing civs on the basis of female leaders (if it's being done) is arbitrary as ☺☺☺☺.
Moors could work I suppose, yes, though it's not an academic term (insofar as labels like Moor and Saracen have extremely broad meanings) and I wouldn't advise using it.
We seem to be carrying this over two threads, which is not necessary.
No, Morocco is a nation state in North Africa. It does not and should not include Andalusia/Iberia and any other Arab-Berber states. Are you thinking of the term 'the Maghreb'? That would be closer...
If it's a general Berber civ, then someone like Abd al-Mu'min would be good.
If it's Morocco as a nation then I have no idea, but nor can I really see the justification for them being added. That...
Well, it'd be like choosing Syria or Jordan as opposed to the Arabs. I'd love the Berbers to be in (and of course they'd have some Moroccan city names) -- but definitely not Morocco specifically.
Morocco is honestly a ludicrous choice. Why not the Berbers in general?
So, four civs remaining then? Is that correct?
Maybe it's Jesus in his war gear?
You're more likely to get a general Berber civ as opposed to Morocco specifically. It'd make much more sense in a game like this.
Back? Did he not do the narration for G+K?
That and there's very little evidence to suggest that they even read these forums. We're barely an afterthought.
Shouldn't the Aztec be Medieval rather than Ancient? As far as native American peoples go, they're some of the more recent.
Assyria and Brazil confirmed, then.
It's incredibly sycophantic. I have no idea why any of this is necessary.
This seems like it's going to be a Firaxis love-in crossed with a discussion on strategy gaming in general. I do not foresee much if anything being given away.
Good lord, these people are nauseating.
Who are the people on the panel?
Israel would be really good. I'd certainly rather have them than Brazil.
Agreed. Spot on.
I'd love to see Kongo as a minimum, and ideally another African civ as well. Timurids would be a nice wildcard civ, even if I agree that there are more deserving inclusions.
My...
Is it too much to assume that another civ will be confirmed at PAX?