Search:

A well-placed Citadel (or two!) can turn a freshly-captured city in to a meat grinder. It's one of my favorite tactics.

Ha, I suggested the possibility of an expansion? Why make expansions when people will pay more money for less content under the DLC model?

You write as if you're too angry to even see straight.

Hollow, petulant legal threats are just immature. Come back when you've calmed down.

Do schools even teach world history anymore?

I mean, really? Really?

You'dve been even happier if you'd waited until today. All Civ V content, including DLC, is 50% off for today's Summer Sale.

This, a thousand times. Sulla's crusade was 100% personal.

No, it's still not. You don't understand what the word "majority" means.

The majority of players answering this poll prefer a different implementation, whereas a smaller plurality prefer the...

42% isn't a majority. Most of this forum's players, that being 58%, prefer a different name.

After you vote in a poll on this forum, your own selections become italicized.

End-game replay is already partially programmed, so hopefully they'll crank it out with this "Part II" patch as well.

Babylon is particularly lackluster; it doesn't even include a scenario.

No worries, it'll show up in a sec. They tend to lag behind like that.

The new in-game advertisement says "VIKING DLC AVAILABLE", not "Denmark".

A fresh poll that doesn't include Mongolia (which was free), includes the map packs, and provides for a "none" option.

What do you drink?

God man go to college, really

Thread for those who drink and Civ

I finally fired her up post-patch, and I must say

I can have allies, what?

(Johnnie Walker green!)

Man, why do you keep ignoring my underlying point? Seriously. I'm not being facetious, but you keep doing these selective narrow quotes without addressing what I've been trying to communicate to...

All I'm saying is that the civilization is clearly pan-Scandinavia even if it's branded as "Denmark."

You didn't answer my question, Valkrionn. Is branding the civ as "Denmark" justifiable? Of course! Was it a prudent decision? Judging by reactions, clearly not.

I'll repeat myself: of all the...

It's already been confirmed.

I mean, "Norwegian ski infantry," seriously?

"Norse" was always the best choice.

Vote Majapahit/Indonesia! :cool:

Edit: FYI, I bumped the Sioux for Korea, so there's no Sioux in either poll currently.

No worries, I think you're just as frustrated as the rest of us. You should stick around if you're willing, though. It'd be nice having more folks around who can actually write well.