PDA

View Full Version : just to let u want civilisation more!!!!


braveheart8
08-26-2007, 03:03 AM
Let’s just get this out of the way right now. I have a little bit of a platonic man crush on Sid Meier. His Civilization strategy games pretty much single-handedly started the whole concept of the “God Game” and, man, don’t even get me started on my unhealthy obsession with Pirates! (the classic PC game, not the filthy pillagers).

It comes as no surprise then that I was overjoyed to see a press release this morning from 2K announcing that they will be publishing Sid Meier’s very first game on the “next” generation of consoles and handhelds (when will people finally stop using the term “next” generation – it confuses me).

The new game, dramatically entitled Sid Meier's Civilization Revolution, is pegged for a spring 2008 release and sounds like it will continue the tried and true gameplay of past Civilization games by offering a robust (and assumed ridiculously addictive) single-player campaign giving the players the opportunity to create a world-encompassing empire, one time period at a time. This new addition to the series also promises extensive multiplayer modes, video and voice chat, and that much sought after “next” (argh!) generation shine!

No word yet on what specific systems this will be released for, but I would bet money on an Xbox360, PlayStation 3, and Nintendo DS version as obvious candidates.

While I am always a little dubious of how RTS games will control on a home console, the fact that dreamboat Sid Meier is taking the reigns as lead designer gives me all the confidence in the world. It also helps that he seems to be extra excited about this new iteration in the successful series, saying that “Civilization Revolution is the game I have always wanted to make.” To put it mildly yayy

ok now top 15 resons u want this game (espesally on xbox 360)

1.the gameplay is alot faster thrilling and expect the combat to take place around about turn 1 lol so instead of 1 game a day u can have 20.yay

2.u can creat army when ever u want i wonder how 3 club man verses 2 spearmen would do.hmmmmmmmm

3.animated battles make the battles more thrilling to watch as u see 6 men get blow by a tnk and a rock luacher blowing 2 out of 3 tanks up as ur last man body flys through the air.

4.the maps are ALOT smaller so when u conquer that annoying opponent and he runs away with 1 explorer it really gets annoying eh not any more.

5.NUCLEAR MISSLE this is the modern death weapon which in the game can turn a whole army and city into dust. 1 word amazing.

6.a navy same as army only sea units.

7.u get see settler getherresources in mines and lumber camp e.t.c

8.animations of characters,i never get tired of watching the trailer of when the militry advisor knocks clearpatra out of the way when she declares war.

9.its on a next generation consol.

10.turnbased which makes the game not lose its orginal feel

11.barbarians are much harder to kill but get this u can make treaties with them.but who trust them.

12.ur advisors actully give u good advice.

13.u get to see the building that u build in ur city

14.treasure play a mojor role in power and eco

15.i cant think of another one so ill just say it good ;)

thx for reading :) tell me wat u think

braveheart8
08-26-2007, 03:07 AM
oh heres a 15

15.u can put vidio cam on so when u talk to a player instead of a animation it cn be u gloating in there face as u wipe him out. as 360 comes with a headset u can talk to other players just to let u know.

braveheart8
08-29-2007, 12:05 PM
can someone comment on my tread i mean omg plzzzz say how cool it is or some thin.

trexmaster
08-31-2007, 09:51 AM
can someone comment on my tread i mean omg plzzzz say how cool it is or some thin.

Here's a (quick) comment :
You could try to write correctly, i.e. use full words (ex : use "you" instead of "u") and punctuation. Even though I'm not bad with English I'm having some difficulties reading your "15 reasons". Please remember when posting on the Net that not everyone understands argotic/SMS american/english.

As for the reasons themselves ... I'm not too sure. These are perfectly valid gameplay or "eye candy" modifications over Civ4 but that doesn't make me absolutely want the game on any "next gen" (and I also do wonder when they'll stop using that term, it's almost as stupid as Web 2.0) console. I'd rather play it on PC. So no, I'm not convinced by your arguments.

trexmaster
08-31-2007, 09:54 AM
I'd rather play it on PC.

Sorry, I just checked the FAQ and saw that it was only made for consoles.

Anyways, I've never been a big fan of strategy games on consoles. It just seems to me that the systems are not made for that kind of game.

braveheart8
09-01-2007, 08:16 AM
im not exactly trying to perswade u to switch just to tell you the reasons why i want it becuase ive got xbox360 for free and strategy games are good on pc but the mulyiplayer online feels alot better but apart from the multiplayer the controls like hotkeys and stuff ill miss.i do alot of pc gaming but starategy games only cuase i dont get them 4 my consoles i only got command and conquer 3 which is awsome online and lord of the rings 2 but it has no startategy involed in it:) note:i do try to write as good as i can but half way through my writing gets a bit sloppy some times. but this game none the less is gona be a great change from my other games i got 9 shootre games 2 sport and 1 strategy and lord of the rings i just want a change thats all so im so obsest with this game.im big fan plus dont it blow ur mind that u can play a multiplayer matvh in between 2 hours to 3 or 4 hours then go in single player which will probably be a lot longer plus the animations are amazing on it but ill miss my 15 to 20 city battles now itll probably be 5 to 10 .none the less this game will be amzing and thx for replieing.:cool: u 2 are cool sorry about my grammer oh and im british so i use words like u wen i type so srry its just wat we do

Berserker666
01-20-2008, 01:05 PM
Damnit learn to spell!